motionads · April 2026

Your new sales hires
close like Jonathan and Elan
from month one.

You built MotionAds into a 50-brand advertising platform by running every sale yourselves. Now you're handing the sales floor to a new team. They don't have seven years of your pattern-matching yet. This proposal is the system that gives it to them.

Engagement
8 modules over 12 to 16 weeks
Delivery shape
Modular, phased, yours to own
Adjacent opportunity
Your data, as a separate revenue line
The situation

The bottleneck isn't tools. It's the two of you.

MotionAds is at the point where the founders can't keep being the sales team. You're hiring reps to take over. The gap between "Jonathan closes this deal" and "a new rep closes this deal" is everything that lives in your heads. Not just the CRM. The judgement.

What's in your heads, right now:

  • 01 Which SA brands are actually in-market for OOH this quarter, and how to reach them before procurement locks next year's media budget.
  • 02 Which exact bike routes move the needle for Heineken vs Pick n Pay vs Vodacom, and why.
  • 03 How to structure a bespoke proposal so Burger King's marketing team says yes, and how to price it with conviction.
  • 04 When a quiet deal is actually dead, and when it needs a nudge in month two.
  • 05 How the last ten campaigns actually went, and which stories land with which brand category.

The scale wall isn't demand. It's judgement.

A new rep joining MotionAds can learn the tools in a week. Learning to think like you takes years. Unless we build a system that does the thinking alongside them from day one.

The real job, stated plainly
What we're building
A sales engine that captures the way you already sell,
and hands it to every new rep on their first day.

Eight modules, built modularly, delivered in three phases. Each one automates a step of the sale, from "how do we find this brand" through "here's the signed contract" to "this is the case study we publish about it." Together they compress days of founder work into hours and let the sales team run without you in the room.

The eight modules

Each one fixes a specific part of the sale.

Modular by design. You can approve, defer, or stage any of them. They reinforce each other. A won proposal feeds the next one's case-study library. But none are load-bearing.

M1 · Foundation

Sales process and CRM backbone

Map your sales stages end-to-end in a working session with you two. Configure the CRM to match. Team playbook so a new rep knows where each deal sits, what's required, and what "Jonathan would do next." Revenue-attribution dashboard live from week one, so every module's impact is visible as it lands.

1 to 2 weeks Must come first
M2 · Inbound

Qualify every lead in seconds, not hours

Every form submission on motionads.co.za gets classified (brand vs driver vs noise), enriched with contact details, scored against your ideal customer profile, and routed. A Tier-1 brand enquiry hits the rep's Slack before they refresh their inbox.

1 to 2 weeks Daily time back
M3 · Outbound

A pipeline of SA brands already spending on advertising

Watch SA ad activity across billboard operators, Meta and Google ad libraries, sponsorship rosters, Loeries and AdFocus shortlists. Surface brands visibly investing in marketing. AI drafts personalised outreach using each prospect's actual current campaigns as the hook. Reps approve and send.

3 to 4 weeks Augments or replaces current lead-gen
M4 · Intelligence

Every rep walks into every call already briefed

Thirty minutes before each meeting, a one-page brief lands in Slack and email. The prospect's recent campaigns. Competitor activity. Relevant MotionAds case studies matched by industry. Talking points. Reps read it en route. Every call lands better than the last.

1 to 2 weeks Compounds over time
M5 · The Crown Jewel

Bespoke proposals at founder quality, in hours not days

The sales call transcript, the pre-call brief, your deal-structuring IP, and your cost calculator feed into a Claude-powered proposal engine. The output: an editable, shareable, branded proposal tuned to the specific brand. The right case studies. The right package. The right narrative. This is the module that lets a first-month rep ship founder-quality work.

6 to 8 weeks The strategic unlock
M6 · Follow-up

No deal goes cold by accident

Stalled deals trigger structured nudges at one, two, and three months. Each one personalised using what the prospect said on the call. Hot replies pull the deal out of automation and alert the rep instantly. Dead leads auto-archive to a six-month nurture. The manager sees deal health on every pipeline record.

1 to 2 weeks Recovers quiet revenue
M7 · Marketing

Campaigns become case studies, automatically

When a campaign wraps, the monthly report feeds directly into a case study draft. Website long-form plus newsletter short-form. You review and approve in one click. Published to motionads.co.za and the newsletter the same morning. The website stays fresh, the library compounds, and M3 outbound has a new hook every month.

2 to 3 weeks Marketing multiplier
M8 · Driver supply

Drivers sign up on WhatsApp, not through a broken portal

Today drivers get bounced from motionads.co.za to a separate portal with no WhatsApp path. We replace it with a conversational WhatsApp flow in English, isiZulu, Afrikaans and isiXhosa. It handles the whole application from greeting to doc upload to qualification. Plus a clean mobile-first web fallback. More drivers onboarded means more inventory to sell.

3 to 5 weeks Supply-side scaling
How it's built

Processes are the investment. Tools are temporary.

Tools change every six months. The sales process you define with us should outlast them. We build in three layers. Each evolves at its own speed, so the system you end up with in three years is owned by MotionAds, not rented from vendors.

Slow layer. Years.

Your sales process

Defined once, refined forever. The stages, the data captured, the rules for when a deal moves forward. This is what you're actually buying.

Medium layer. 1 to 3 years.

Custom services we build for you

Classifiers, proposal engines, follow-up orchestrators, case study pipelines. Extended as the process matures. Never rewritten from scratch.

Fast layer. Annual.

Commercial tools that accelerate

The SaaS that gets us to Phase 0 fast. Every subscription is a candidate for future in-house replacement, once it gets too expensive or too rigid.

Specific tool choices named in this proposal are our current leans, based on deep 2026 research across the market. Each gets revalidated with fresh research at the start of the relevant module's build phase. The SaaS landscape shifts too fast to commit in a proposal. What we commit to here is the thinking, the structure, and the judgement.

Phasing

Wins in week three. Transformation by week sixteen.

Three phases, overlapping where they can. Phase 0 delivers felt wins in the first month. Every rep gets time back, no leads slip. Each phase validates the system before we expand it.

Phase 0Weeks 1 to 4

Foundation and quick wins

Sales process mapped and in the CRM. Inbound leads auto-qualified and routed. Follow-up automation live. Call-recording rolled out to the sales team. Revenue attribution dashboard running from day one so you see the impact as it lands.

M1 CRM M2 Inbound M6 Follow-up Call recording
Phase 1Weeks 4 to 8

Sales intelligence and marketing compounding

Every call gets a 30-minute-before brief. Case studies start publishing themselves to motionads.co.za and the newsletter. Marketing compounding begins. Fresh case studies feed M3 outbound credibility and M5 proposals.

M4 Pre-call briefs M7 Case study pipeline Beehiiv migration
Phase 2Weeks 7 to 16 (overlapping)

Growth engines

Outbound pipeline goes live. SA brands surfaced by ad-spend signal, AI-drafted personalisation, deliverability-safe sending. The bespoke proposal builder ships. WhatsApp driver sign-up replaces the portal. These three run in parallel because they're independent.

M3 Outbound M5 Proposal engine M8 WhatsApp and web UX
Two decisions worth flagging upfront

Where we have a lean, not a lock.

These are the two choices in the proposal with the widest range of defensible answers. Our leans are based on current research. Each one gets revalidated with fresh research at the start of the relevant module's build. The SaaS market shifts too fast to commit now.

1
Which CRM powers the whole engine?

CRM platform

You're on Pipedrive today. Pipedrive works. The SA market default for small sales teams selling into enterprise brands is HubSpot, which likely wins long-term. Either platform builds the same eight modules on top without compromise.

Our lean: HubSpot, with Pipedrive as a valid alternative.
2
What does the finished proposal look like?

Proposal format

Four paths. Custom-built slides powered by Claude. Claude plus Canva (using your Brand Kit). Qwilr's interactive web-proposal format. Or Gamma's AI-slide tool. The AI logic is identical across all four. Only the rendering differs, which means you can swap later without a rewrite.

Our lean: Claude with Canva Connector. Reps edit in Canva they already know, Brand Kit locks design consistency, lowest per-rep cost.
Why Atab

We build systems that you own. Not that you rent from us.

We don't sell seats in our own software. We design the sales process with you, build the custom services on top, and document it so you could run it without us in 18 months. Whether you do or not is your call.

01

AI-native from day one

Claude, GPT-class models, and smaller open-source models. Swapped per task based on cost and quality. Provider-agnostic architecture means you're never locked to one vendor's pricing.

02

Modular, not monolithic

Every module is independently swappable. If something doesn't work, rip it out. Nothing else breaks. No big-bang rewrites, ever.

03

Built to be handed over

Code you own. Documentation you can read. A runbook that a non-technical operator can follow. We're a partner, not permanent infrastructure.

The Data Side

The second revenue line you're already sitting on.

Seven years of bike-trip data across your active fleet. Burger King has already asked to use some of it. This isn't speculative. It's a side of the business you know has potential. The job of this section is to show you how big that potential could actually get, and exactly how we'd build it with close to zero incremental risk on your side.

What you have

What the data actually is, and why nobody else in SA has it.

Every delivery bike you've branded has been a moving sensor across Johannesburg, Cape Town, Durban, Pretoria, Gqeberha. Where foot traffic actually flows by hour. Which suburbs are densifying. Which routes over-index for QSR versus grocery. Seven years of it, at route-level granularity, across the five biggest metros.

Nielsen runs household panels with no route-level data. JCDecaux, Primedia, and Tractor Outdoor sell static inventory and don't know who passes their boards. Municipal traffic departments track cars, not delivery traffic, and not at your granularity or frequency. Google and Apple mobility data exists but is aggregated, not SA-specific, and not available for commercial licensing. The data you already have is genuinely rare.

Where the revenue comes from

Who would actually pay for this, and for what.

Revenue stream 1

Impressions reports for existing clients

Bespoke route-level impression reports for the brands already on your bikes. Real eyeballs, actual dwell time, demographic overlay. Example: Burger King asking which of their 50 Joburg routes drove the most dwell outside universities during Q4. Doubles CPM justification, locks in renewals, pre-empts procurement pushback. Highest leverage, because it protects the base you already have.

Revenue stream 2

Commissioned studies for non-advertisers

Property developers asking whether foot traffic is growing in Rosebank year-on-year. Retail chains asking which SA suburbs over-index for QSR but are underserved. Insurance actuaries sizing real delivery-driver risk exposure by route. Fintech teams segmenting informal cash-flow patterns. Enterprise studies with clear scope and clear price.

Revenue stream 3

Data Partnership retainers

Annual retainers for strategic buyers who want ongoing access. Unlimited questions answered, four custom reports per year, quarterly strategy session, first look at new datasets. Five partnerships at around R1m each is R5m in recurring revenue with high retention. This is how Nielsen, Kantar, and McKinsey monetise proprietary data.

How it gets sold

Bespoke first. Subscription later, maybe never.

There are two commercial shapes to consider for a data business like this: bespoke studies per client, or a monthly self-serve subscription. The right call at this stage is clearly bespoke. Seven reasons:

  1. SA enterprise buyers don't self-serve. Insurance actuaries, QSR strategy teams, FMCG trade marketers all want a report with a conclusion and a meeting. Not a BI tool they have to drive themselves.
  2. Higher ticket per deal. Bespoke commands R150,000 to R2m per engagement. Subscription is R5,000 to R50,000 per month. You need a lot of subs to match one enterprise study, and you'd have to build the product first to get there.
  3. Near-zero build cost to start. Bespoke needs data, an analyst, and a report template. Subscription needs a governed warehouse, BI layer, auth, permissions, UI, billing. Six to twelve months of product work before first revenue.
  4. Data freshness doesn't matter for this asset. Trip data doesn't change intra-day in a way buyers need live. Monthly refreshes are enough, which kills the "live dashboard" value prop of subscription.
  5. Each bespoke deliverable is defensible. Competitors can't screenshot a report and cancel it next month. Subscription products get that treatment every day.
  6. POPIA risk is manageable per engagement. With bespoke, you tailor anonymisation and data-sharing terms per client per use case. Self-serve locks you into a fixed privacy posture across every buyer, and it's harder to get signed off.
  7. Low operational burden. One salesperson running the pipeline. Each report is scoped separately and paid for by the client who asked. Nothing becomes fixed cost.

Subscription becomes right later, once 15 to 20 bespoke studies reveal which use cases repeat. Three insurers asking the same underwriting question, four QSRs asking the same trade-area question. That's when the subscription product writes itself. The earlier engagements literally tell you what to build.

Phased posture over three years.

  • Year 1 90% bespoke studies, 10% exploratory pilots with one or two anchor partners.
  • Year 2 Layer in three to five Data Partnership retainers as repeatable patterns emerge.
  • Year 3+ Only now consider productising the most-repeated study type as a templated or subscription asset.
Why it's low-risk for you

You've already paid for most of the infrastructure.

This isn't a second build. The systems we put in place for the sales engine in M1 to M8 carry over almost entirely to the data side. Five direct reuses:

M1
CRM runs a second pipeline in parallel. Different deal stages, different buyer personas, same underlying system. No migration. No second CRM bill.
M3
Outbound engine re-aimed at insurance underwriting leads, QSR strategy heads, fintech product teams, property-fund analysts. Same Clay and Smartlead and Claude personalisation stack. Different target list, different hooks.
M5
Proposal engine is the biggest carry-over. Bespoke research studies are structurally identical to bespoke advertising proposals: custom to the client, built from a template, delivered as an editable slide deck. Same Claude skills, same rendering. The adaptations are new skill content (study frameworks, methodology sections, anonymised case snippets) and new source data (trip data instead of bike inventory). Roughly 30% of M5's build effort adapts it for research reports.
M6
Follow-up automation runs identically for the second pipeline. Same cadences, new templates.
M7
Case-study pipeline becomes a report-preview engine. Finished studies, with client names anonymised, become the marketing asset that sells the next study. Direct carry-over.

Net effect: the data side doesn't require a second tech stack. Roughly 70% of the work is already shared with what you're paying for in the core engagement. That's what makes this a side revenue line, not a second company.

How it gets delivered

Flexible delivery. That's the feature.

One salesperson owns the data-side pipeline. Reports get delivered by whoever is the right fit for the study at hand: an internal hire if you bring one on, a specialist consultancy for niche methodologies, us where it fits, or some combination. The point isn't locking in a supplier. The point is being able to stand up a real deliverable for whichever study converts, without rebuilding the back office each time.

This keeps the data side as a lean revenue line rather than a fixed-cost product team. You scale what converts. You don't build overhead ahead of demand.

A separate engagement. One we're keen to take on.

This sits on its own track, separate from the eight modules in this proposal. We're willing to put our fees on the line to help build it, because we believe in the asset. The shape of that commercial conversation is something we'd explore together once the core engagement is underway and you're ready to look at it seriously.

Before either side commits: a one-day data audit, a POPIA read on third-party licensing and onward resale, confirmation of telematics-vendor contract terms, and interviews with five candidate customers across three brand categories and two non-advertisers.

How we work together

Billed phase by phase.

Phase 0 has its own scope and its own fee, agreed upfront. Phase 1 and Phase 2 are scoped and priced once Phase 0 has shipped and the impact is visible in the CRM. You see the wins before committing to the next chunk of work. No big-ticket commitment upfront, no money tied up in assumptions.

Next steps

Let's scope Phase 0 together.

A thirty-minute working session. We walk your current sales process, confirm the Phase 0 modules, lock the CRM direction, and agree the start date. The first signed SOW covers Phase 0 only. You see wins before committing to Phase 1 and 2.